SA JWOC Performance

South African Performance at the Junior World Orienteering Championships

In order to determine whether or not high performance initiatives are baring fruit it is necessary to track the performance of our elite orienteers on the world stage.

There are essentially two measures of performance that are recorded here. The first is the athlete’s time compared to the winning time.  This is normalised as a percentage of the winning time to enable comparison across different races.

The second measure is the athlete’s position in the race.  For comparison this is expressed as a percentage of the size of the field.

Since the sizes of fields have changed over time and because the quality of the field may change over time, the preferred measure to use to monitor performance improvement is the athlete’s time expressed as a percent of the winner’s time.

What neither of these measures accounts for is the technical difficulty of the terrain.  This is somewhat of a subjective assessment and is not readily quantified.  Hence this set of records ignores the relative technical difficulty of the terrain.

For each event type, a table of individual results is recorded.  This permits analysis of individual improvement.  The tables are followed by plots of performance, which are useful in assessing team performance.

Performances in JWOC Long

Men

Year Name Position Field Time Winner’s Time % of Winner’s Time Relative Position %
1996 Gary de Klerk 89 162 01:58:59 01:22:43 144% 54.9%
1996 Martin Terry 133 162 02:57:34 01:22:43 215% 82.1%
1996 Nicholas Mulder 137 162 03:08:15 01:22:43 228% 84.6%
1996 Mark Greeff DSQ 162
1997 Nicholas Mulder 143 159 01:52:22 01:00:51 185% 89.9%
1997 Andrew Havemann 147 159 02:01:36 01:00:51 200% 92.5%
1998 Nicholas Mulder 73 111 01:17:52 00:56:17 138% 65.8%
2000 Pieter Nieuveld 146 155 02:12:23 01:09:53 189% 94.2%
2006 Dylan Hemer 136 167 02:18:17 01:10:41 196% 81.4%
2006 Alex Pope 154 167 02:34:00 01:10:41 218% 92.2%
2008 Dylan Hemer 119 169 01:47:37 01:12:22 149% 70.4%
2008 Alex Pope 126 169 01:51:05 01:12:22 154% 74.6%
2009 Brad Lund 135 168 02:14:48 01:05:55 205% 80.4%
2010 Michael Crone 142 156 02:29:57 01:20:48 186% 91.0%
2010 Brad Lund 137 156 02:11:55 01:20:48 163% 87.8%
2010 JP Sissing 149 156 03:54:39 01:20:48 290% 95.5%

Women

Year Name Position Field Time Winner’s Time % of Winner’s Time Relative Position %
1996 Michele Mulder 95 110 02:46:26 01:06:24 250.7% 86%
1997 Michele Mulder 121 138 01:40:10 00:53:36 186.9% 88%
2000 Michele Mulder 129 146 01:43:49 00:59:43 173.8% 88%
2009 Sarah Pope 100 122 01:53:43 00:54:12 209.8% 82%
2009 Jessica Lund 101 122 01:54:14 00:54:12 210.8% 83%
2009 Zoe Brentano 112 122 02:15:59 00:54:12 250.9% 92%
2009 Jessica Hemer 113 122 02:25:52 00:54:12 269.1% 93%
2009 Salome van Hoepen 117 122 02:56:04 00:54:12 324.8% 96%
2009 Stephanie Courtnage 118 122 03:10:31 00:54:12 351.5% 97%
2010 Jessica Lund 114 122 02:18:30 01:01:55 223.7% 93%
2010 Sarah Pope 99 122 01:43:37 01:01:55 167.3% 81%
2010 Salome van Hoepen 108 122 01:49:42 01:01:55 177.2% 89%
2010 Zoe Brentano 113 122 02:05:18 01:01:55 202.4% 93%

The connecting lines track the improvement of an individual athlete.

In the case of the Women there is a clear improvement from 2009 to 2010.  In both years the same athletes participated.  The best performance in 2010 represents the best-ever performance by a woman in the JWOC Long event.

In the case of the Men there is also a clear improvement from 2009 to 2010.  The best performance for the Men was achieved by the athlete who also attended the previous year.  The best performance in 2010 is nearing the best-ever performance of a man in the JWOC Long event.

Performances in JWOC Short/ Middle (Heats)

Men

Year Name Position Field Time Winner’s Time % of Winner’s Time Relative Position %
1996 Martin Terry 120 165 00:45:33 00:29:05 157% 72.7%
1996 Gary de Klerk 146 165 00:54:07 00:29:05 186% 88.5%
1996 Nicholas Mulder 153 165 00:59:06 00:29:05 203% 92.7%
1996 Mark Greeff 160 165 01:04:49 00:29:05 223% 97.0%
2000 Pieter Nieuveld 41 52 00:35:31 00:25:54 137% 78.8%
2006 Alex Pope 46 57 00:34:42 00:20:17 171% 80.7%
2006 Dylan Hemer 49 56 00:42:28 00:20:26 208% 87.5%
2008 Alex Pope 38 58 00:37:36 00:27:04 139% 65.5%
2008 Dylan Hemer 48 58 00:44:56 00:25:55 173% 82.8%
2009 Brad Lund 55 58 00:47:21 00:26:17 180% 94.8%
2010 Mike Crone 52 53 00:36:14 00:21:38 167% 98.1%
2010 JP Sissing 53 53 00:49:13 00:21:00 234% 100.0%
2010 Brad Lund 42 52 00:30:53 00:21:43 142% 80.8%

Women

Year Name Position Field Time Winner’s Time % of Winner’s Time Relative Position %
1996 Michele Mulder 101 113 00:52:10 00:26:32 196.6% 89%
2000 Michele Mulder 36 49 00:30:49 00:24:19 126.7% 73%
2009 Salome van Hoepen 34 42 00:37:07 00:25:19 146.6% 81%
2009 Zoe Brentano 38 42 00:48:04 00:27:20 175.9% 90%
2009 Jessica Hemer 38 42 00:45:18 00:25:19 178.9% 90%
2009 Sarah Pope 35 40 00:45:24 00:23:53 190.1% 88%
2009 Jessica Lund 36 40 00:47:37 00:23:53 199.4% 90%
2009 Stephanie Courtnage 39 42 00:58:35 00:27:20 214.3% 93%
2010 Salome van Hoepen 36 42 00:34:57 00:23:20 149.8% 86%
2010 Jessica Lund 37 42 00:37:14 00:23:21 159.5% 88%
2010 Zoe Brentano 39 42 00:41:11 00:23:21 176.4% 93%
2010 Stephanie Courtnage 37 41 00:34:34 00:22:45 151.9% 90%
2010 Sarah Pope 39 41 00:38:58 00:22:45 171.3% 95%


The connecting lines track the improvement of an individual athlete.

In the case of the Women there is a clear overall improvement from 2009 to 2010, although the best performance of 2009 was not improved upon in 2010. In both years the same athletes participated. There is still some way to go to attain the best-ever performance for a woman in the JWOC Middle event, which was achieved in 2000.

In the case of the Men there is also a clear improvement from 2009 to 2010. The best performance for the Men was achieved by the athlete who also attended the previous year. The best performance in 2010 is nearing the best-ever performances of a man in the JWOC Middle event. These were achieved in 2000, closely followed by 2008.

The worst performance in 2010 was at a comparable level to historic performances for first-time participants at JWOC.

Performances in JWOC Sprint

Men

Year Name Position Field Time Winner’s Time % of Winner’s Time Relative Position %
2006 Dylan Hemer 130 162 00:15:38 00:11:45 133.0% 80.2%
2006 Alex Pope 136 162 00:15:59 00:11:45 136.0% 84.0%
2008 Dylan Hemer 121 173 00:16:48 00:13:21 125.8% 69.9%
2008 Alex Pope 130 173 00:17:14 00:13:21 129.1% 75.1%
2009 Brad Lund 143 169 00:20:40 00:14:43 140.4% 84.6%
2010 Michael Crone 109 153 00:16:30 00:13:04 126.3% 71.2%
2010 Brad Lund 137 153 00:18:40 00:13:04 142.9% 89.5%
2010 JP Sissing 142 153 00:20:12 00:13:04 154.6% 92.8%

Women

Year Name Position Field Time Winner’s Time % of Winner’s Time Relative Position %
2009 Stephanie Courtnage 82 120 00:17:31 00:13:34 129.1% 68%
2009 Salome van Hoepen 84 120 00:17:49 00:13:34 131.3% 70%
2009 Jessica Lund 93 120 00:18:46 00:13:34 138.3% 78%
2009 Sarah Pope 97 120 00:19:25 00:13:34 143.1% 81%
2009 Jessica Hemer 108 120 00:22:27 00:13:34 165.5% 90%
2009 Zoe Brentano 110 120 00:23:36 00:13:34 174.0% 92%
2010 Stephanie Courtnage 63 118 00:16:58 00:13:36 124.8% 53%
2010 Jessica Lund 92 118 00:19:01 00:13:36 139.8% 78%
2010 Sarah Pope 101 118 00:20:33 00:13:36 151.1% 86%
2010 Salome van Hoepen 103 118 00:21:03 00:13:36 154.8% 87%
2010 Zoe Brentano 104 118 00:21:40 00:13:36 159.3% 88%

The connecting lines track the improvement of an individual athlete.

In the case of the Women there is a clear overall improvement from 2009 to 2010, with a new best-ever performance for a woman in the JWOC Sprint event.  In both years the same athletes participated.

In the case of the Men there is also a clear improvement from 2009 to 2010.  The best performance for the Men was achieved by an athlete who attended JWOC for the first time in 2010.  The best performance in 2010 was fractionally the best-ever performance of a man in the JWOC Sprint event, previously achieved in 2008.

3 Comments

  1. jeremy

    a really nice read, thanks Garry. I really like the graphs, but i also have a suggestion to, in my mind, better illustrate performance improvements. How about lines for each athletes, not necessarily labeled, but so it is clear that the lines all descend (hopefully). This seems to be the third ‘crop’ of juniors and many of them will be in the jnr system for a number of years, not just 2 or 3 performances that we have had in the past. As i see it the next couple years will be telling and we must keep up the effort, so that the line keeps descending.

  2. Garry

    Thanks for the feedback & a good suggestion Jeremy. I have made the changes you suggest & it does help.

  3. Pingback: South African Junior Team off to Poland :

Comments are closed.