South African Performance at the Junior World Orienteering Championships
In order to determine whether or not high performance initiatives are baring fruit it is necessary to track the performance of our elite orienteers on the world stage.
There are essentially two measures of performance that are recorded here. The first is the athlete’s time compared to the winning time. This is normalised as a percentage of the winning time to enable comparison across different races.
The second measure is the athlete’s position in the race. For comparison this is expressed as a percentage of the size of the field.
Since the sizes of fields have changed over time and because the quality of the field may change over time, the preferred measure to use to monitor performance improvement is the athlete’s time expressed as a percent of the winner’s time.
What neither of these measures accounts for is the technical difficulty of the terrain. This is somewhat of a subjective assessment and is not readily quantified. Hence this set of records ignores the relative technical difficulty of the terrain.
For each event type, a table of individual results is recorded. This permits analysis of individual improvement. The tables are followed by plots of performance, which are useful in assessing team performance.
Performances in JWOC Long
Men
Year | Name | Position | Field | Time | Winner’s Time | % of Winner’s Time | Relative Position % |
1996 | Gary de Klerk | 89 | 162 | 01:58:59 | 01:22:43 | 144% | 54.9% |
1996 | Martin Terry | 133 | 162 | 02:57:34 | 01:22:43 | 215% | 82.1% |
1996 | Nicholas Mulder | 137 | 162 | 03:08:15 | 01:22:43 | 228% | 84.6% |
1996 | Mark Greeff | DSQ | 162 | ||||
1997 | Nicholas Mulder | 143 | 159 | 01:52:22 | 01:00:51 | 185% | 89.9% |
1997 | Andrew Havemann | 147 | 159 | 02:01:36 | 01:00:51 | 200% | 92.5% |
1998 | Nicholas Mulder | 73 | 111 | 01:17:52 | 00:56:17 | 138% | 65.8% |
2000 | Pieter Nieuveld | 146 | 155 | 02:12:23 | 01:09:53 | 189% | 94.2% |
2006 | Dylan Hemer | 136 | 167 | 02:18:17 | 01:10:41 | 196% | 81.4% |
2006 | Alex Pope | 154 | 167 | 02:34:00 | 01:10:41 | 218% | 92.2% |
2008 | Dylan Hemer | 119 | 169 | 01:47:37 | 01:12:22 | 149% | 70.4% |
2008 | Alex Pope | 126 | 169 | 01:51:05 | 01:12:22 | 154% | 74.6% |
2009 | Brad Lund | 135 | 168 | 02:14:48 | 01:05:55 | 205% | 80.4% |
2010 | Michael Crone | 142 | 156 | 02:29:57 | 01:20:48 | 186% | 91.0% |
2010 | Brad Lund | 137 | 156 | 02:11:55 | 01:20:48 | 163% | 87.8% |
2010 | JP Sissing | 149 | 156 | 03:54:39 | 01:20:48 | 290% | 95.5% |
Women
Year | Name | Position | Field | Time | Winner’s Time | % of Winner’s Time | Relative Position % |
1996 | Michele Mulder | 95 | 110 | 02:46:26 | 01:06:24 | 250.7% | 86% |
1997 | Michele Mulder | 121 | 138 | 01:40:10 | 00:53:36 | 186.9% | 88% |
2000 | Michele Mulder | 129 | 146 | 01:43:49 | 00:59:43 | 173.8% | 88% |
2009 | Sarah Pope | 100 | 122 | 01:53:43 | 00:54:12 | 209.8% | 82% |
2009 | Jessica Lund | 101 | 122 | 01:54:14 | 00:54:12 | 210.8% | 83% |
2009 | Zoe Brentano | 112 | 122 | 02:15:59 | 00:54:12 | 250.9% | 92% |
2009 | Jessica Hemer | 113 | 122 | 02:25:52 | 00:54:12 | 269.1% | 93% |
2009 | Salome van Hoepen | 117 | 122 | 02:56:04 | 00:54:12 | 324.8% | 96% |
2009 | Stephanie Courtnage | 118 | 122 | 03:10:31 | 00:54:12 | 351.5% | 97% |
2010 | Jessica Lund | 114 | 122 | 02:18:30 | 01:01:55 | 223.7% | 93% |
2010 | Sarah Pope | 99 | 122 | 01:43:37 | 01:01:55 | 167.3% | 81% |
2010 | Salome van Hoepen | 108 | 122 | 01:49:42 | 01:01:55 | 177.2% | 89% |
2010 | Zoe Brentano | 113 | 122 | 02:05:18 | 01:01:55 | 202.4% | 93% |
The connecting lines track the improvement of an individual athlete.
In the case of the Women there is a clear improvement from 2009 to 2010. In both years the same athletes participated. The best performance in 2010 represents the best-ever performance by a woman in the JWOC Long event.
In the case of the Men there is also a clear improvement from 2009 to 2010. The best performance for the Men was achieved by the athlete who also attended the previous year. The best performance in 2010 is nearing the best-ever performance of a man in the JWOC Long event.
Performances in JWOC Short/ Middle (Heats)
Men
Year | Name | Position | Field | Time | Winner’s Time | % of Winner’s Time | Relative Position % |
1996 | Martin Terry | 120 | 165 | 00:45:33 | 00:29:05 | 157% | 72.7% |
1996 | Gary de Klerk | 146 | 165 | 00:54:07 | 00:29:05 | 186% | 88.5% |
1996 | Nicholas Mulder | 153 | 165 | 00:59:06 | 00:29:05 | 203% | 92.7% |
1996 | Mark Greeff | 160 | 165 | 01:04:49 | 00:29:05 | 223% | 97.0% |
2000 | Pieter Nieuveld | 41 | 52 | 00:35:31 | 00:25:54 | 137% | 78.8% |
2006 | Alex Pope | 46 | 57 | 00:34:42 | 00:20:17 | 171% | 80.7% |
2006 | Dylan Hemer | 49 | 56 | 00:42:28 | 00:20:26 | 208% | 87.5% |
2008 | Alex Pope | 38 | 58 | 00:37:36 | 00:27:04 | 139% | 65.5% |
2008 | Dylan Hemer | 48 | 58 | 00:44:56 | 00:25:55 | 173% | 82.8% |
2009 | Brad Lund | 55 | 58 | 00:47:21 | 00:26:17 | 180% | 94.8% |
2010 | Mike Crone | 52 | 53 | 00:36:14 | 00:21:38 | 167% | 98.1% |
2010 | JP Sissing | 53 | 53 | 00:49:13 | 00:21:00 | 234% | 100.0% |
2010 | Brad Lund | 42 | 52 | 00:30:53 | 00:21:43 | 142% | 80.8% |
Women
Year | Name | Position | Field | Time | Winner’s Time | % of Winner’s Time | Relative Position % |
1996 | Michele Mulder | 101 | 113 | 00:52:10 | 00:26:32 | 196.6% | 89% |
2000 | Michele Mulder | 36 | 49 | 00:30:49 | 00:24:19 | 126.7% | 73% |
2009 | Salome van Hoepen | 34 | 42 | 00:37:07 | 00:25:19 | 146.6% | 81% |
2009 | Zoe Brentano | 38 | 42 | 00:48:04 | 00:27:20 | 175.9% | 90% |
2009 | Jessica Hemer | 38 | 42 | 00:45:18 | 00:25:19 | 178.9% | 90% |
2009 | Sarah Pope | 35 | 40 | 00:45:24 | 00:23:53 | 190.1% | 88% |
2009 | Jessica Lund | 36 | 40 | 00:47:37 | 00:23:53 | 199.4% | 90% |
2009 | Stephanie Courtnage | 39 | 42 | 00:58:35 | 00:27:20 | 214.3% | 93% |
2010 | Salome van Hoepen | 36 | 42 | 00:34:57 | 00:23:20 | 149.8% | 86% |
2010 | Jessica Lund | 37 | 42 | 00:37:14 | 00:23:21 | 159.5% | 88% |
2010 | Zoe Brentano | 39 | 42 | 00:41:11 | 00:23:21 | 176.4% | 93% |
2010 | Stephanie Courtnage | 37 | 41 | 00:34:34 | 00:22:45 | 151.9% | 90% |
2010 | Sarah Pope | 39 | 41 | 00:38:58 | 00:22:45 | 171.3% | 95% |
The connecting lines track the improvement of an individual athlete.
In the case of the Women there is a clear overall improvement from 2009 to 2010, although the best performance of 2009 was not improved upon in 2010. In both years the same athletes participated. There is still some way to go to attain the best-ever performance for a woman in the JWOC Middle event, which was achieved in 2000.
In the case of the Men there is also a clear improvement from 2009 to 2010. The best performance for the Men was achieved by the athlete who also attended the previous year. The best performance in 2010 is nearing the best-ever performances of a man in the JWOC Middle event. These were achieved in 2000, closely followed by 2008.
The worst performance in 2010 was at a comparable level to historic performances for first-time participants at JWOC.
Performances in JWOC Sprint
Men
Year | Name | Position | Field | Time | Winner’s Time | % of Winner’s Time | Relative Position % |
2006 | Dylan Hemer | 130 | 162 | 00:15:38 | 00:11:45 | 133.0% | 80.2% |
2006 | Alex Pope | 136 | 162 | 00:15:59 | 00:11:45 | 136.0% | 84.0% |
2008 | Dylan Hemer | 121 | 173 | 00:16:48 | 00:13:21 | 125.8% | 69.9% |
2008 | Alex Pope | 130 | 173 | 00:17:14 | 00:13:21 | 129.1% | 75.1% |
2009 | Brad Lund | 143 | 169 | 00:20:40 | 00:14:43 | 140.4% | 84.6% |
2010 | Michael Crone | 109 | 153 | 00:16:30 | 00:13:04 | 126.3% | 71.2% |
2010 | Brad Lund | 137 | 153 | 00:18:40 | 00:13:04 | 142.9% | 89.5% |
2010 | JP Sissing | 142 | 153 | 00:20:12 | 00:13:04 | 154.6% | 92.8% |
Women
Year | Name | Position | Field | Time | Winner’s Time | % of Winner’s Time | Relative Position % |
2009 | Stephanie Courtnage | 82 | 120 | 00:17:31 | 00:13:34 | 129.1% | 68% |
2009 | Salome van Hoepen | 84 | 120 | 00:17:49 | 00:13:34 | 131.3% | 70% |
2009 | Jessica Lund | 93 | 120 | 00:18:46 | 00:13:34 | 138.3% | 78% |
2009 | Sarah Pope | 97 | 120 | 00:19:25 | 00:13:34 | 143.1% | 81% |
2009 | Jessica Hemer | 108 | 120 | 00:22:27 | 00:13:34 | 165.5% | 90% |
2009 | Zoe Brentano | 110 | 120 | 00:23:36 | 00:13:34 | 174.0% | 92% |
2010 | Stephanie Courtnage | 63 | 118 | 00:16:58 | 00:13:36 | 124.8% | 53% |
2010 | Jessica Lund | 92 | 118 | 00:19:01 | 00:13:36 | 139.8% | 78% |
2010 | Sarah Pope | 101 | 118 | 00:20:33 | 00:13:36 | 151.1% | 86% |
2010 | Salome van Hoepen | 103 | 118 | 00:21:03 | 00:13:36 | 154.8% | 87% |
2010 | Zoe Brentano | 104 | 118 | 00:21:40 | 00:13:36 | 159.3% | 88% |
The connecting lines track the improvement of an individual athlete.
In the case of the Women there is a clear overall improvement from 2009 to 2010, with a new best-ever performance for a woman in the JWOC Sprint event. In both years the same athletes participated.
In the case of the Men there is also a clear improvement from 2009 to 2010. The best performance for the Men was achieved by an athlete who attended JWOC for the first time in 2010. The best performance in 2010 was fractionally the best-ever performance of a man in the JWOC Sprint event, previously achieved in 2008.
a really nice read, thanks Garry. I really like the graphs, but i also have a suggestion to, in my mind, better illustrate performance improvements. How about lines for each athletes, not necessarily labeled, but so it is clear that the lines all descend (hopefully). This seems to be the third ‘crop’ of juniors and many of them will be in the jnr system for a number of years, not just 2 or 3 performances that we have had in the past. As i see it the next couple years will be telling and we must keep up the effort, so that the line keeps descending.
Thanks for the feedback & a good suggestion Jeremy. I have made the changes you suggest & it does help.
Pingback: South African Junior Team off to Poland :